Much has been written and spoken in India's "demographic dividend". With nearly 40% of the population - some 500 million people - under the age of 15, it is estimated that almost 25% of the total workforce is in India in 2030. What this means is that the quality of education received by young children India today will affect us all in the near future.engineering colleges in hyderabad
Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has pledged to significantly improve education spending and human resource development minister Kabil Sibal, even with some bold and interesting proposals for education reform. For a time there was a lively debate in the country on steps to take, but the government is still in progress in key policy decisions. Many commentators attribute the rejection of the government of the United Progressive Alliance of political prudence. There are, for example, considerable opposition to allowing foreign investment in higher education.
The government responded by commissioning studies and the creation of a labyrinth of committees to determine the best approach. These are practical tools to expose any type of commitment and buy time. Unfortunately, a mysterious code and a fractured polity only help matters in this case. But it would be hard to overstate how important it is for India to move quickly to take full advantage of the shooting population.
The scope of educational reforms required in India is huge, and yes, lasting change takes time, and a broad consensus. But to get the ball rolling, there are a number of short-term measures that the government can start right away:
1. Commit to spending more on education. Back in 1968, the Kothari Commission recommended that India spends 6% of its GDP on education. However, never in the 43 years since the total education expenditure in India exceeded 4.3% of GDP in any given year. Setting aside more money for education is an essential first step demonstrating government commitment to reform education.
2. Fix basic education first. There are two main tasks here: Raising inclusion of 100% of the cities and countryside, and then to minimize drop-outs. Both must work together to be significant. Mumbai, for example, enrollment rates are very high - over 95% - but only a small proportion of these students actually finish school, because the absurdity of dropout rates. In addition to eliminating gender disparities at this early stage of the primary. Shocking in some rural areas, thousands of girls do not attend school because there are no separate toilets for them. Other girls do not attend because the walk to school - often in a nearby village - it is dangerous.
3. Yes, the answer is to build more schools with better infrastructure. But even when government and private institutions are building more schools, the quality of education has fallen sharply. Teacher training needs much work and effort. This is encouraging to see that the number of NGOs are quick to fill this gap, but most of these efforts are still confined to urban areas, especially large metropolitan cities. We need quality education to produce high quality students capable of playing an active role in rapidly growing countries.
4. Priority to education in higher education. In the early 50's, Jawaharlal Nehru, Prime Minister of India, decided to build on the platform of higher education in India to compete technologically in the era of the Cold War. Under his leadership, institutions like the India Institute of Technology have expanded and the country focused on producing more engineers and scientists. But the expansion of higher education has been accompanied by the neglect of education. This continues today, with new engineering universities increasing every day. Schools are often seen as little more than a means to achieve a strong engineering program. This trend was very profound impact.engineering colleges in delhi
Of course, we were in a better position to benefit from the information technology revolution over the past decade. And we sent many graduates abroad, where their success has increased in India "soft power". But even with our focus on higher education, India still faces serious shortage of skilled labor in areas such as health, aviation and engineering leading to economic bottlenecks. The problem is that candidates are not of high enough caliber. Companies can not rely on the talent of their contributions and expenses are forced to design training programs in-house cost.
Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has pledged to significantly improve education spending and human resource development minister Kabil Sibal, even with some bold and interesting proposals for education reform. For a time there was a lively debate in the country on steps to take, but the government is still in progress in key policy decisions. Many commentators attribute the rejection of the government of the United Progressive Alliance of political prudence. There are, for example, considerable opposition to allowing foreign investment in higher education.
The government responded by commissioning studies and the creation of a labyrinth of committees to determine the best approach. These are practical tools to expose any type of commitment and buy time. Unfortunately, a mysterious code and a fractured polity only help matters in this case. But it would be hard to overstate how important it is for India to move quickly to take full advantage of the shooting population.
The scope of educational reforms required in India is huge, and yes, lasting change takes time, and a broad consensus. But to get the ball rolling, there are a number of short-term measures that the government can start right away:
1. Commit to spending more on education. Back in 1968, the Kothari Commission recommended that India spends 6% of its GDP on education. However, never in the 43 years since the total education expenditure in India exceeded 4.3% of GDP in any given year. Setting aside more money for education is an essential first step demonstrating government commitment to reform education.
2. Fix basic education first. There are two main tasks here: Raising inclusion of 100% of the cities and countryside, and then to minimize drop-outs. Both must work together to be significant. Mumbai, for example, enrollment rates are very high - over 95% - but only a small proportion of these students actually finish school, because the absurdity of dropout rates. In addition to eliminating gender disparities at this early stage of the primary. Shocking in some rural areas, thousands of girls do not attend school because there are no separate toilets for them. Other girls do not attend because the walk to school - often in a nearby village - it is dangerous.
3. Yes, the answer is to build more schools with better infrastructure. But even when government and private institutions are building more schools, the quality of education has fallen sharply. Teacher training needs much work and effort. This is encouraging to see that the number of NGOs are quick to fill this gap, but most of these efforts are still confined to urban areas, especially large metropolitan cities. We need quality education to produce high quality students capable of playing an active role in rapidly growing countries.
4. Priority to education in higher education. In the early 50's, Jawaharlal Nehru, Prime Minister of India, decided to build on the platform of higher education in India to compete technologically in the era of the Cold War. Under his leadership, institutions like the India Institute of Technology have expanded and the country focused on producing more engineers and scientists. But the expansion of higher education has been accompanied by the neglect of education. This continues today, with new engineering universities increasing every day. Schools are often seen as little more than a means to achieve a strong engineering program. This trend was very profound impact.engineering colleges in delhi
Of course, we were in a better position to benefit from the information technology revolution over the past decade. And we sent many graduates abroad, where their success has increased in India "soft power". But even with our focus on higher education, India still faces serious shortage of skilled labor in areas such as health, aviation and engineering leading to economic bottlenecks. The problem is that candidates are not of high enough caliber. Companies can not rely on the talent of their contributions and expenses are forced to design training programs in-house cost.
